<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UX models benchmarked</title>
	<link>http://www.micropctalk.com/2007/12/17/ux-models-benchmarked/</link>
	<description>An enthusiast site for the Sony Vaio Micro PC.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: chicken</title>
		<link>http://www.micropctalk.com/2007/12/17/ux-models-benchmarked/#comment-94256</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.micropctalk.com/2007/12/17/ux-models-benchmarked/#comment-94256</guid>
					<description>Hey guyi notice that the vista models have more video ram is this shared video ram or seperate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guyi notice that the vista models have more video ram is this shared video ram or seperate?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Engine</title>
		<link>http://www.micropctalk.com/2007/12/17/ux-models-benchmarked/#comment-55732</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.micropctalk.com/2007/12/17/ux-models-benchmarked/#comment-55732</guid>
					<description>Come on guys, keep in mind the vido hardwae and software is by Intel.
Thy are about the worst vdeo manufacturer on the market.

If Intel's drivers only emulate OpenGL via DirectX it most likely a decision persuaded by Microsoft</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on guys, keep in mind the vido hardwae and software is by Intel.<br />
Thy are about the worst vdeo manufacturer on the market.</p>
<p>If Intel&#8217;s drivers only emulate OpenGL via DirectX it most likely a decision persuaded by Microsoft
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.micropctalk.com/2007/12/17/ux-models-benchmarked/#comment-43870</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 05:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.micropctalk.com/2007/12/17/ux-models-benchmarked/#comment-43870</guid>
					<description>I would love to see how the vista machines (380,390,490) bench with XP clean installed in place of windows...

Anyone out there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see how the vista machines (380,390,490) bench with XP clean installed in place of windows&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyone out there?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Orion</title>
		<link>http://www.micropctalk.com/2007/12/17/ux-models-benchmarked/#comment-43536</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.micropctalk.com/2007/12/17/ux-models-benchmarked/#comment-43536</guid>
					<description>Another benchmark chart with anothers devices (link) give you a more extended vision. Interesting now is try 'fritz chess benchmark' in U2200 processor.Thanks.

http://www.tweaks2k2.com/Vista_score.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another benchmark chart with anothers devices (link) give you a more extended vision. Interesting now is try &#8216;fritz chess benchmark&#8217; in U2200 processor.Thanks.</p>
<p><a href='http://www.tweaks2k2.com/Vista_score.htm' rel='nofollow'>http://www.tweaks2k2.com/Vista_score.htm</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: MeanSquare</title>
		<link>http://www.micropctalk.com/2007/12/17/ux-models-benchmarked/#comment-43407</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.micropctalk.com/2007/12/17/ux-models-benchmarked/#comment-43407</guid>
					<description>The reason for OpenGL being so slow on Vista (unless the hardware manufacturers incorporate it into their drivers) is because Vista emulates OpenGL.  The OGL calls are routed through DirectX for rendering.  The conversion process slows it down considerably.  Intel does incorporate OpenGL in the drivers for the graphics chip on the UX, but not very well at all.  Conversely, OpenGL is built into OSX and the UX, running OSX does a passable job.  (I don't have a lot of MAC programs or benchmarks to test just how well though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason for OpenGL being so slow on Vista (unless the hardware manufacturers incorporate it into their drivers) is because Vista emulates OpenGL.  The OGL calls are routed through DirectX for rendering.  The conversion process slows it down considerably.  Intel does incorporate OpenGL in the drivers for the graphics chip on the UX, but not very well at all.  Conversely, OpenGL is built into OSX and the UX, running OSX does a passable job.  (I don&#8217;t have a lot of MAC programs or benchmarks to test just how well though.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dr. YSG</title>
		<link>http://www.micropctalk.com/2007/12/17/ux-models-benchmarked/#comment-42746</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 16:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.micropctalk.com/2007/12/17/ux-models-benchmarked/#comment-42746</guid>
					<description>Let me clarify the benchmark numbers I am looking for:

What is the difference between a DirectX9 applicaitn running on Vista, Versus a DirectX9 applicaiton running on WinXP (UX 390N)? I assume none. But this might tell people if rolling back to XP is worth it for non-graphics applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me clarify the benchmark numbers I am looking for:</p>
<p>What is the difference between a DirectX9 applicaitn running on Vista, Versus a DirectX9 applicaiton running on WinXP (UX 390N)? I assume none. But this might tell people if rolling back to XP is worth it for non-graphics applications.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Yechezkal</title>
		<link>http://www.micropctalk.com/2007/12/17/ux-models-benchmarked/#comment-42595</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 15:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.micropctalk.com/2007/12/17/ux-models-benchmarked/#comment-42595</guid>
					<description>HOw do DirectX ( (and even 10) applicaitons work on the UX390N. I have a VRML applicaiton that is getting 30FPS.  BUt how does an the benchmarkes compare wihen one used DirectX instead of OpenGL?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HOw do DirectX ( (and even 10) applicaitons work on the UX390N. I have a VRML applicaiton that is getting 30FPS.  BUt how does an the benchmarkes compare wihen one used DirectX instead of OpenGL?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ZeroCore Network &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Benchmarks comparing OpenGL on Vista and XP</title>
		<link>http://www.micropctalk.com/2007/12/17/ux-models-benchmarked/#comment-42581</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 11:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.micropctalk.com/2007/12/17/ux-models-benchmarked/#comment-42581</guid>
					<description>[...] For further information, click here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] For further information, click here. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: anh</title>
		<link>http://www.micropctalk.com/2007/12/17/ux-models-benchmarked/#comment-42169</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.micropctalk.com/2007/12/17/ux-models-benchmarked/#comment-42169</guid>
					<description>Memory test in 180 is not surprising me because it is speed test. So they are all same speed, that mean they should have same performance although 180 only has 512MB.
490 has SSD model MCBQE48GKMPQ-M1A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Memory test in 180 is not surprising me because it is speed test. So they are all same speed, that mean they should have same performance although 180 only has 512MB.<br />
490 has SSD model MCBQE48GKMPQ-M1A
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: bzzz</title>
		<link>http://www.micropctalk.com/2007/12/17/ux-models-benchmarked/#comment-42059</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 04:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.micropctalk.com/2007/12/17/ux-models-benchmarked/#comment-42059</guid>
					<description>cowards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cowards
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
