View Full Version : Performance difference between the 1.06 and 1.2 Core Solo
psp888
08-11-2006, 11:55 PM
Does anyone know how much of a performance difference there is between the Core Solo 1.2 and 1.06? I can't seem to find any benchmarks for these processors.
Is it performance worth the extra cost?
VaioWannabe
08-12-2006, 06:28 AM
Does anyone know how much of a performance difference there is between the Core Solo 1.2 and 1.06? I can't seem to find any benchmarks for these processors.
Is it performance worth the extra cost?
though, i already got my UX - im still interested in the performance difference...
... i would assume that there wouldnt be much, though; and it may not justify the cost... i mean, what else do you need with a mobile device!?!
Floodguy
08-12-2006, 04:53 PM
Does anyone know how much of a performance difference there is between the Core Solo 1.2 and 1.06? I can't seem to find any benchmarks for these processors.
Is it performance worth the extra cost?
Look for HDBENCH (http://www.hdbench.net/) and CRYSTALMARK (http://crystalmark.info/?lang=en)Bench.
Here is a UX50 Windows XP pro jp.
79
78
bchliu
08-14-2006, 10:06 PM
That 10% performance was not justified for me to pay a 20% premium for it. If it was a duo core on the other hand, then it would be a different story.
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.